| |
|  The Salt Lake Tribune has posted a brief mention of yesterday's rally that I attended.  PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND ABORTION-RIGHTS SUPPORTERS... (Al Hartmann/The Salt Lake Tribune ) | |
|
| Today a rally was held at the Utah State Capitol by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU to lobby for a "no" vote to H.B. 235, the bill that originally would have banned abortions in Utah, but has now been reverted back to being a "trigger" bill. The prevailing message was that women must retain the right to do what they want with their own bodies and the way to avoid abortions is by providing sex education (and not just abstinence) as well as legal and safe abortions if needed. Pom Poms Not Bomb Bombs, Utah's Radical Cheerleaders, of which I am a member, participated. Here is the appropro cheer we did: 2-4-6-8! Women's care is second rate! That's not decent in our state! We want access not debate! Uh-uh, uh, uh ( Read more... )Here are some photos:  ( Read more... ) | |
|
| Sadly, the Utah Senate has passed SB155, which will take away legislative oversight of nuclear waste coming into our state. This gives Energy Pollutions Solutions one more step towards total autonomy over this issue. Speaking for EnergySolutions and its operations plans, Sen. Darin Peterson, R-Nephi, said, "Every time they have tried to change, they have been opposed by one group or another, and they have never lost one of those challenges. Never." There should be a point where the company can go forward without as much hassle, according to Peterson. EnergySolutions is performing a service, said Peterson, sponsor of SB155. "They have proven themselves to be good partners."
Sen. Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake, said he was not speaking to impugn the corporate reputation of Energy Solutions. "What I'm trying to do here is to think about the public policy behind what is a significantly important material to many of the people of the state of Utah," McCoy said. Many do not want to leave decisions about the material "in the hands of a group of bureaucrats." "I think the Legislature should keep some skin in this game," said McCoy. He said officials charged with oversight "absolutely have a role in the process," and they are the experts. "What I have a problem with is absenting ourselves and the governor and the county from a role in that process."
There is a lot of confusion, according to the article, over the language of the law and of this bill. But one thing is clear to me: There are a number of Utah legislators who do not care to listen to their constituents and care only about money and not people. This bill is a prime example of that. | |
|
| Some representatives in the Utah Legislature are up to their old tricks by imposing inequitable laws. In today's Salt Lake Tribune: Cell phones, tanning booths, video games - they all pose potential threats to children, according to Utah lawmakers. But ATVs and hunting rifles are apparently OK for even the youngest children to use, if parents say so. Once again, the 2007 Utah Legislature is zigzagging its way around parental rights, the best interests of children and government policy. With some bills, they have decided parents really do know best. Isn't that typical of governments all over? Dictate what's in the best interests of people and their children without conulting them. Yup. It's in our best interests to listen. NOT! | |
|
| Utah Supreme Court Justices are requesting more money. Apparently there is a vacancy in the 7th district that has attracted on five applicants, short four from the state's mandate of nine applications being received before proceeding in the hiring process. In today's Deseret News: In her annual State of the Judiciary address to the Utah Legislature, Chief Justice Christine M. Durham said more and more of Utah's attorneys seem disinterested in becoming judges, mainly because the pay is so much less than what they can make in the private sector and even less than legal positions within Utah's government. "I know that no one becomes a judge to get rich," Durham said, "... but I am concerned about trends and morale." Some 11 percent of district judgeships have turned over in the past two years and 35 percent of all Utah judges are eligible to retire in the next four years. Currently, district court judges make $114,004 while Court of Appeals judges are paid $120,100 and the five Supreme Court justices make $125,800 annually. Historically, lawmakers have been reluctant to grant the raises asked by the courts. Last year, the Utah courts asked for a 7 percent increase and got 3 percent. The year before that, judges received a 1 percent boost. This year, Durham said the courts are asking for an 11 percent raise.This might not be an issue if the entire system were overhauled so that judges wouldn't be working so much, inclusive of changing laws for non-violent crimes. Additionally - 11 percent???? Compared to the average workers pay in Utah, the current judge's salary is wonderful! I can't beleive that Utah would raise the salaries of government employees so much while, at the same time, arguing over what minimum wages should be for the average employee that keeps our economy going. Priorities, people, priorities. | |
|
|